![]() ![]() I continued to run both paper and plastic until mid-2013 when I gave up paper except for flights and endorsements requiring a CFI signature. What happened to paper? Well, for me it was in stages (hence the ide of runing them in tandem), mostly having to do with my perception of FAA and third party acceptance. You will see its developer posted in that other thread and he might post here. It went through some iterations until early 2007 when I stopped using it in favor of MyFlightBook, which I have happily used ever since. But I was still using DOS (are you old enough to remember?) when I wrote a simple digital logbook around 1992 or 1993. ![]() It starts in the Stone Age, so its relevance is up to you. FWIW, I'll give you a little personal history on that. One alternative is to get an inexpensive paper logbook and run them in tandem, anticipating that at some point you will go full digital. It's changing but digital logbooks are just new enough that there are still those who resist, even though it's futile.ĭon't discount the idea of both at the beginning. He or she probably also knows the preferences of whatever examiner you may ultimately do your checkride with. Ultimately, since it is your instructor who will need to sign your logbook for training given (an FAA requirement), it is something I would be discussing with him or her. That kind of preference is really what is comes down to. Easy math multiple copies to prevent loss. Paper has the advantages of paper digital of digital. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |